A jewellery and watches team needs to align macro images from three photographers without flattening material character. This model shows the production decisions, owners and evidence gates Rupato would configure.
Modelled batch: 420 modelled images. Deadline model: 4-week campaign. Illustrative operating scenario—not a customer claim. This page demonstrates an operating design and does not attribute a result, saving or endorsement to an unnamed customer.
The scenario avoids one generic shine treatment. Each metal and stone family receives a reference that describes highlight width, colour and protected detail.
Dust, support removal, focus-stack seams and prong integrity are inspected at 100% before catalogue-level colour comparison.
Web, print and campaign crops are created from the signed-off high-resolution master rather than from previously compressed files.
Day 1: Material and source audit · Day 2–4: 12-image specialist pilot · Week 2–3: Production by material family · Week 4: Zoom QC and campaign delivery
Pilot: 12 pieces across materials · QC: 100% zoom + catalogue view · Masters: High-resolution retained · Evidence: Material-family approval. A live engagement would add baseline, correction rate, approved lead time and cost evidence before publishing a result.
No. They define a realistic pilot and workflow.
Gold, steel, enamel and stones need different reflection logic.
Source defects, first-pass approval, correction reasons and customer review time.
Rupato keeps uploads, specifications, tasks, review and delivery attached to the same production record.
Start an order ↗